Legal Opinion

State v. Dulsworth

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 29, 1989PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JONES, Judge.

The appellants; Timmy Lydell Duls-worth 1 and Roger Cordell Stewart, were found guilty of robbery with a deadly weapon by a jury of their peers. Duls-worth was also convicted of assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree. The trial judge found that Duls-worth was a persistent offender and committed especially aggravated offenses; and he imposed a Range II sentence of life imprisonment as to each offense. The two sentences are to be served concurrently. Stewart was found to be a standard offender, and the trial court imposed a Range I sentence of twenty-five…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. MossTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1985

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. State v. GentryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  3. State v. RuaneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. State v. ErvinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  5. State v. DraperCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API