Legal Opinion

Mayor of Monroe v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 1, 1935No. 24212PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Where, after the rendition of a verdict and judgment, a new trial has been granted, the case stands-upon the docket for trial as if there had been no trial. Civil Code (1910), § 6094; Anderson v. Clark, 70 Ga. 362 (2) ; Scott v. Powell Paving Co., 43 Ga. App. 705 (159 S. E. 895). This applies where a case at law had been referred to an auditor, and the issues tried by the jury were upon exceptions to the auditor’s findings on the facts. Civil Code (1910), § 5141. Although, under the ruling of the appellate court as applied to the law and the evidence, the verdict directed for the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Nowell v. Mayor of MonroeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Scott v. Powell Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Nowell v. Mayor of MonroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Holton v. LankfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Worley v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Union Central Life Insurance v. TrundleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Georgia Power Co. v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API