Union Central Life Insurance v. Trundle
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
1. Upon a reversal without direction by this court of the judgment of the trial court, the case, upon the return of the remittitur, stands upon the docket for trial de novo, and is subject to amendment as in other instances.
2. Upon the return of the remittitur an amendment to the declaration striking the original allegation that due proofs of disability as required by the policy had been furnished, and substituting the allegation that the defendant had unconditionally refused to pay and had waived this requirement, did not set up a new cause of action and was not objectionable in that it had…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Walker v. DoughertySupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Mayor of Monroe v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. MoweryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Porter v. BlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Hall v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Liberty National Life Insurance v. ParrimoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Gaddis v. GEORGIA SOUTHERN & FLORIDA RAILWAY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.