Cotulla v. La Salle Water Storage Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtEly, C. J.
Appellee, a corporation formed under the laws of Texas for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, and operating dams, reservoirs, lakes, wells, canals, flumes, laterals, and other necessary appurtenances, to be used for irrigation, navigation, milling, mining, and stock-raising purposes, instituted proceedings before the county judge of La Salle county to condemn two certain tracts of land belonging to appellant, the first being one-half an acre, desired for a dam site, and the second 3% acres, desired for a storage reservoir site. The Statutes as to condemnation were strictly followed,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Imperial Irrigation Co. v. JayneTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Borden v. Trespalacios Rice & Irrigation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1905
- Rensselaer and Saratoga R.R. Co. v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Pocantico Water Works Co. v. BirdNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lower Colorado River Authority v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Co-Operative Vineyards Co. v. Ft. Stockton Irrigated Lands Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Jowell v. BillingsleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Spafford v. Brevard CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Spafford v. Brevard County, FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926