Legal Opinion

Jowell v. Billingsley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 14, 1933No. 1420PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALLAGHER, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by appellant, R., L. Jowell, against appellee, G. L. Billingsley, to recover the sum of $803.98 as a statutory penalty for the alleged receipt by appellee' of usurious interest (Rev. St. 1925, art. 5073). A trial by the court without a jury resulted in a judgment for appellee. No transcript of the testimony introduced at such trial was filed. The case is presented in this court on the findings of fact filed by the court below. Such findings are voluminous and consist in part of a recital of the evidence. It appears' from such findings that on…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Dallas Trust & Savings Bank v. BrashearTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Salvin v. . Myles Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Call v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Planters National Bank of Virginia v. Wysong & Miles Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCray v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Madden v. Harlandale BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API