Legal Opinion
Jenkins v. Ritenour
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 21, 1989No. 47-CA-88Published
1Opinion of the Court
Milligan, Presiding Judge.
This is an action for relief under the Real Estate Recovery Fund, R.C. 4735.12. The Fairfield County Common Pleas Court found that the case does not fall within the provisions of R.C. Chapter 4735 and, finding that the applicants are not entitled to relief, granted summary judgment dismissing the action.
The applicants appeal, assigning a single error:
“Assignment of Error
“The lower court’s decision that appellants are not entitled to payment out of the Real Estate Recovery Special Account (Revised Code § 4735.12) is against the weight of the evidence and is contrary…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Dent v. WinkleOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Ball v. RitenourOhio Court of Appeals · 1989