Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Ritenour

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1989No. 47-CA-88Published

1Opinion of the Court

Milligan, Presiding Judge.

This is an action for relief under the Real Estate Recovery Fund, R.C. 4735.12. The Fairfield County Common Pleas Court found that the case does not fall within the provisions of R.C. Chapter 4735 and, finding that the applicants are not entitled to relief, granted summary judgment dismissing the action.

The applicants appeal, assigning a single error:

“Assignment of Error
“The lower court’s decision that appellants are not entitled to payment out of the Real Estate Recovery Special Account (Revised Code § 4735.12) is against the weight of the evidence and is contrary…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Dent v. WinkleOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ball v. RitenourOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API