Legal Opinion
Durso v. Misiorek
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 22, 1985No. 2014PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
On January 22, 1985, this court, sua sponte, dismissed this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Durso v. Misiorek, 3 Conn. App. 212, 485 A.2d 1309 (1985), rev’d, 200 Conn. 656, 512 A.2d 917 (1986). The state had appealed from a judgment rendered after a jury found that the defendant was not the father of the plaintiff’s child.1 On certification to the Supreme Court, it was determined that, although the attorney general was not served with the plaintiff’s petition which commenced the Superior Court action and did *95not participate in that trial, the attorney general was nonetheless a proper…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re MongilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Town of Chaplin v. BalkusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Thode v. ThodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Mechanics Savings Bank v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Hall v. Dichello Distributors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burke v. RuggerioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991