Legal Opinion

Hall v. Dichello Distributors, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 25, 1986No. 4243PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

In this action, the defendants, Dichello Distributors, Inc. (DDI), James Dichello and Burton Zempsky,1 appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court requiring Zempsky to turn over to the plaintiff certain shares of stock in DDI, a corporation which distributes beer for Anheuser Busch. The defendants raise numerous grounds of error all primarily concerning the Superior Court’s jurisdiction over the action and the procedures it used in reaching its decision. We conclude that the defendants’ claims are without merit, and, accordingly, we find no error.

A brief summary of the undisputed facts and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pasquariello v. PasquarielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Reynolds v. VroomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  3. Carten v. CartenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  4. Labella v. LabellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. State Ex Rel. Morris v. BulkeleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re Joshua S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Rowe v. Superior Court, Judicial District of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. BomberoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. Claydon v. FinizieConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. Zempsky's Appeal from ProbateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API