Legal Opinion

Town of Chaplin v. Balkus

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 8, 1983No. 10670PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

This is an action to enforce municipal trailer regulations. The plaintiff, the town of Chaplin, brought an action in two counts against the defendants, Wallace J. Balkus and Lucille E. Balkus, to require them to remove or apply for an occupancy permit for one of their trailers and to remove entirely their second, unoccupied trailer. The defendants filed an answer, special defenses and a counterclaim which was stricken on the plain tiff’s motion by Bannehy, J. After referral of the ease to Ron. Alva P. Loiselle, state referee, judgment was entered by stipulation of counsel. On the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  4. Stoner v. StonerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Ridgeway v. RidgewaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Conservation Commission v. PriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Lombard v. Edward J. Peters, Jr., P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. State v. McNellisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API