Legal Opinion
Otto Wolff Handelsgesellschaft, mbH v. Sheridan Transportation Co.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided September 18, 1992No. 1:92-cr-00194PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CLARKE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED.
FACTS
This is an in personam admiralty action brought by plaintiff, cargo claimant, against defendant, vessel owner, for damage to plaintiff’s cargo of steel rebars allegedly sustained while en route on defendants’ vessel from Norfolk, VA to San Juan, Puerto Rico in April 1990. Plaintiff purchased 5006.8 metric tons of deformed concrete reinforcing bars of new billet steel (“rebars”) from Port Everglades Steel Corporation (“Port…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Guzman v. PichiriloSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hale Container Line, Inc. v. Houston Sea Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Allianz Ins. Co. of Canada v. Cho Yang Shipping Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- Tuff-N-Rumble Management, Inc. v. Sugarhill Music Publishing Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Hale Container v. Houston SeaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998