Legal Opinion

Pearce v. Texas Employers Insurance Association

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 22, 1966No. 16606PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

This workmen’s compensation case presents the narrow question of whether an agreement for compromise settlement of a claim under the Act, which specifically provides that it includes liability of the insurer for future medical aid, hospital services, nursing, chiropractic services, and medicines incurred after date of approval of the settlement by the Industrial Accident Board, precludes the employee from subsequently claiming and recovering medical expenses necessarily incurred by him in connection with a recurrence of the physical disability made the subject of the original…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Woolsey v. Panhandle Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. HiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Industrial Accident Board v. GlennTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Lowry v. Anderson-Berney Building Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Davis v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. PoormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Pearce v. Texas Employers Insurance AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Jones v. Illinois Employers Insurance of Wausau, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  4. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co. v. FriersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Fidelity-Southern Fire Insurance Co. v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API