Legal Opinion

Menezes v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided July 21, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shubow J.

The plaintiff,2 injured while shopping on the premises of the defendant as a result of being struck by a hamper falling from a shelf, challenged the denial of her motion for a new trial based solely on her claim that the damages awarded were inadequate. The report does not disclose any request for a ruling addressed to the issue of damages. The plaintiffs brief contains not a single citation, makes no contention that the judge abused his discretion in any way, but is merely an argument for higher damages of the kind addressed to a fact-finder contending that a higher sum than the one…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Haller v. E. A. Spry & Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1970
  4. Mills v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1972
  5. Murphy v. EnglishMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cimino v. Perfection Autobody, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
  2. Discover Bank v. RinnMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API