Cimino v. Perfection Autobody, Inc.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.
This is an action in contract to recover for damage to the plaintiff’s vehicle. After trial, judgment was entered for the plaintiff in the amount of SlO.OOO.OO.1 The defendant thereafter filed this Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8A expedited appeal.
The Rule 8A “Summary of Undisputed Facts” indicates that the plaintiff brought his 1977 Chevrolet to the defendant for minor repairs and painting. Although the plaintiff paid for the work done, he was dissatisfied with the paint job. The defendant re-painted the car several times. At one point subsequent to the completion of *110repairs but before…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Starr v. FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Guaranty-First Trust Co. v. Textron, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Knowles v. Gilchrist Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Rourke v. Cadillac Automobile Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sullivan v. RossMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Arrow Financial Services, LLC. v. MannettaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Discover Bank v. RinnMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013
- Sanieoff v. CurtisMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014