Landrith v. Roberts
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Bret D. Landrith and Samuel K. Lipari, proceeding pro se, bring this action for injunctive and declaratory relief against the Honorable John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court (“Chief Justice”) in his capacity as administrator of the Judicial Conference of the United States (“Judicial Conference”). Plaintiffs believe that their constitutional rights have been violated in a multitude of ways, and that these violations are ultimately attributable to, and redressable by, the Chief Justice…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jordan v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Mehari v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- (PC) O'Brien v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Food & Water Watch v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Gourneni v. WolfDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.