Legal Opinion
In Re: Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing and 4(d) Rule Litigation - Mdl 1993
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 17, 2011No. Misc. No. 2008-0764Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) IN RE POLAR BEAR ENDANGERED ) SPECIES ACT LISTING AND § 4(d) ) RULE LITIGATION ) Misc. No. 08-764 (EGS) ) MDL Docket No. 1993 ) ) This Document Relates To: ) ) Safari Club Int’l, et al. v. ) Salazar,1 et al., No. 08-881; ) Hershey v. Salazar, et al., ) No. 09-324; Kreider v. Salazar, ) et al., No. 09-325; Atcheson, ) et al. v. Salazar, et al., ) No. 09-941 ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION On May 15, 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“the Service” or “the agency”) published its final rule listing the polar bear as a threatened species…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.