Legal Opinion

Changzhou Hawd Flooring, Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 14, 2014No. Slip Op. 14-81; Court 12-00020Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND MEMORANDUM

POGUE, Senior Judge:

The motion before the court comes from numerous exporters of multilayered wood flooring manufactured in the People’s Republic of China (“Movants”), 1 who seek Plaintiff-Intervenor status in Changzhou

Hawd Flooring, Co. v. United States, Court Number 12-00020, pursuant to US-CIT Rules 7(b) and 24(a)(3). Mot. to Intervene at 1. Defendant, the United States, and DefendanUntervenor, the Coalition for American Hardwood Parity (“CAHP”), oppose the motion. Def.’s Resp. to the Mot. for Intervention, ECF No. 97; DefIntervenor’s Oppo’n to Mot. to Intervene, ECF…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Ontario Forest Industries Assoc v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  3. Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  4. Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
  5. Siam Food Products Public Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API