Thompson v. Ryan
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Webster District Court. — H. E. Fry, Judge. Action at law to recover a commission on the sale or exchange of real property. There was a trial to a jury, and a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant appeals. The plaintiff has also appealed from the action of the trial court in instructing the jury to allow interest, in case of recovery, from the commencement of the suit, instead of from the date plaintiff claims his service was completed.
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
i. brokers : commission payable íaiiúreCtol1con-:” trac™8*6 con 1. Defendant, having first appealed, is the appellant. Numerous errors are assigned by appellant for reversal, and points by appellee for affirmance. There is one thing about the record that strikes us as peculiar, and that is that appellee does not x ' ^‘S1113 all the question of fraud argued by appellant. The question of fraud or representation was tendered in the pleadings, but withdrawn or ignored by the court in the instructions. Nor does appellant argue at all the question of interest, which is presented by plaintiff on Ms…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Flynn v. JordalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Nagl v. SmallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Beamer v. StuberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Greusel v. DeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Snyder v. FidlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Leigh v. SloanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922