Legal Opinion

Beamer v. Stuber

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 11, 1914PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Wapello District Court. — Hons. Frank W. Eichelberger and Francis M. Hunter, Judges, Action for commission alleged to have been earned in finding a purchaser for land. From judgment as prayed, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, C. J.

The farm contained two hundred and forty acres, and lay three and one-half or four miles from Eddy-ville. The owner, Charles Stuber, had listed it for sale with several agents, among whom were R. G. Beamer and Warner & Hawkins. Beamer had a working arrangement with H. A. Bauman, who resided at Pella, whereby commissions earned in producing purchasers found by him should be divided. Warner & Hawkins had a similar arrangement with James Jelsma, of Pella. On July 28, 1909, Garrett and Henry Yan Zante, at the instance of Bauman, went out with Beamer to look at Stuber’s farm and others. Henry Yan…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDermott v. MahoneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Flynn v. JordalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Johnson Bros. v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Nagl v. SmallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Walker and McClelland v. ChanceySupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. Reynor v. MackrillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Hutchins & Co. v. ShermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  4. Sanden v. AusenhusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. Wareham v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API