Legal Opinion
Department of Education, State of Hawaii v. Terrel Bell, Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 10, 1985No. 82-7697, 82-7698PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
The Education Appeals Board (“EAB”) found Hawaii violated provisions of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub.L. 89-10, 79 Stat. 27, as amended, 20 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. (1976 Supp. V) (“Title I”). The Secretary of Education (“Secretary”) demanded that Hawaii repay the Department of Education $2,109,618. Hawaii appeals from the EAB decision, claiming the Secretary misinterpreted and misapplied Title I provisions in determining the validity of the audit conducted by the Health Education and Welfare Audit Agency (“Audit Agency”). We affirm.
FACTS…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bell v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bresgal v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Flores Ex Rel. Flores v. ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- State of California, Department of Education v. William J. Bennett, Secretary of Education, United States Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- In Re SanglierUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
- Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.