Legal Opinion · Dissent

Walston v. Boeing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 2014No. 88511-7Published

1Dissent

¶16 (dissenting) — The majority holds that the deliberate injury provision in the Industrial Insurance Act (IIA), Title 51 RCW, does not apply when an employer knowingly and intentionally exposes an employee to high levels of asbestos causing that employee to develop and eventually die from an asbestos-related disease. I disagree.

Wiggins, J.

¶17 I would hold that while it is a close call, petitioners Gary G. Walston and Donna Walston (Walston) have presented sufficient evidence to survive summary judgment. By 1985, The Boeing Company knew that forcing its workers to inhale asbestos fibers…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. Vallandigham v. Clover Park School District No. 400Washington Supreme Court · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API