Legal Opinion

Fore v. Bles

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 6, 1986No. 1 CA-CIV 8258PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREER, Judge.

In her divorce from Thomas Bles, Patricia Fore was awarded an interest in loan repayments due on a promissory note that was payable to Bles upon demand. The sole question on appeal is whether Fore had standing to sue for payment on the note. We hold that Fore was a transferee as result of the dissolution decree within the meaning of A.R.S. § 47-3201(A). Therefore, she had standing to sue on the note.

I. FACTS

Bles and his son were the principal shareholders in Industrial Service and Supply, Inc. (ISSI). Bles lent ISSI $133,431.44 in exchange for ISSI’s promissory note. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Koelsch v. KoelschArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Vance v. VanceArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Scheid v. ShieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities Co. v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. Hanalei, BRC Inc. v. PorterHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API