Legal Opinion

Vance v. Vance

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1979No. 14454PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by Margaiene Vance from an order of the trial court dismissing her complaint against Virgil Vance and Western States Farm Management Company. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19(e), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.

We must answer two questions on appeal:

1. Is the complaint barred by the doctrine of res judicata because of the dismissal of the action in a prior case?

2. May a co-payee on a note sue the maker without the concurrence of the other payee?

The facts necessary for a determination of this matter on appeal are as follows. On 27…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Di Orio v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Tucson Gas & Electric Company v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Temp-Rite Engineering Co. v. Chesin Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Tucson-North Town Home Apartments Homeowners' Ass'n v. RobbCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. Phillips v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Noble v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Norriega v. MacHadoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Paul R. Peterson Construction, Inc. v. Arizona State Carpenters Health & Welfare Trust FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. McHenry County Credit Co. v. FeuerhelmCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  5. Beltran v. HARRAH'S ARIZONA CORP.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API