Legal Opinion

Miceli v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1983No. 16251-SAPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

Petitioner brings this statutory special action procedure, alleging that the respondent Commission abused its discretion in ordering her to travel from her home in Tucson for a medical examination in Phoenix. The relief sought was an order requiring the Commission and its administrative law judge to grant petitioner’s Motion for Protective Order and an interlocutory stay of further proceedings before the Commission pending determination of the propriety of the order for examination. Our jurisdiction is based on Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5, and authority to grant such relief is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Collins v. KruckerArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Arizona State Highway Commission v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Meva Corporation v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Arizona Osteopathic Medical Association v. FridenaArizona Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rasmussen by Mitchell v. FlemingArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Thoeni v. Consumer Electronic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. RojersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. RASMUSSEN BY MITCHELL v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Sensing v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API