Legal Opinion

Mullins v. De Soto Securities Co.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided April 27, 1944No. 257PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTERIE, District Judge.

The same three parties apply for leave to intervene at this time who were denied the same request previously. See Mullins v. De Soto Securities Company, Inc., et al. (Hardee et al., Interveners), D.C., 2 F.R.D. 502. A full and proper appreciation of what is before us can only be had by a reading of this case as it has run the course of the courts, to-wit: (a) Mullins v. De Soto Securities Co., Inc., et al., D.C., 45 F.Supp. 871; (b) Mullins et al. v. De Soto Securities Co., Inc., et al., 5 Cir., 136 F.2d 55, 56; (c) Mullins v. De Soto Securities Co., Inc., et al.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pollitz v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Forrester v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Just v. Idaho Canal & Improvement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Montgomery Light Co. v. LaheySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Earl v. LofquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duncan v. National Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  2. Truncale v. Universal Pictures Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  3. In Re Fed. Nat. Mortg. Ass'n Sec., Derivative, ErisaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Mullins v. De Soto Securities Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1944
  5. Federal Housing Finance Agency v. RainesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API