Legal Opinion

Love Terminal Partners v. City of Dallas, Tex.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided October 31, 2007No. Civil Action 3:06-CV-1279-DPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER, District Judge.

The court must decide whether plaintiffs have stated a federal antitrust claim arising from defendants’ conduct preceding enactment of the Wright Amendment Reform Act of 2006 (“Reform Act”), Pub.L. No. 109-352, 120 Stat. 2011 (2006), and from conduct to be taken pursuant to the Reform Act, including demolition of a private passenger terminal at Dallas Love Field Airport (“Love Field”) in which plaintiffs hold a leasehold interest. Concluding that plaintiffs have failed to state a claim, the court grants defendants’ Fed. R.Civ.P.…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Berry v. Indianapolis Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
  2. Love Terminal Partners, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  3. Berry v. Indianapolis Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
  4. Love Terminal Partners, L.P. v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  5. Love Terminal Partners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API