Love Terminal Partners v. City of Dallas, Tex.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SIDNEY A. FITZWATER, District Judge.
The court must decide whether plaintiffs have stated a federal antitrust claim arising from defendants’ conduct preceding enactment of the Wright Amendment Reform Act of 2006 (“Reform Act”), Pub.L. No. 109-352, 120 Stat. 2011 (2006), and from conduct to be taken pursuant to the Reform Act, including demolition of a private passenger terminal at Dallas Love Field Airport (“Love Field”) in which plaintiffs hold a leasehold interest. Concluding that plaintiffs have failed to state a claim, the court grants defendants’ Fed. R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Berry v. Indianapolis Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
- Love Terminal Partners, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Berry v. Indianapolis Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
- Love Terminal Partners, L.P. v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
- Love Terminal Partners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.