Legal Opinion
Westerman v. Cleland
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1909No. Civ. No. 612PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Mandamus. Petitioner alleged that he was employed by defendants as a teacher and principal of the Ukiah High School for the year ending June 30, 1907, “at a fixed and agreed salary of $1,500 and petitioner accepted such employment”; that he performed all the duties required of him as such principal during said year for which he received the sum of $1,350 and no more, and there is now due him the further sum of $150. He prays for the peremptory writ of the court commanding the defendants “to draw and deliver to petitioner their order on the county superintendent of schools of the said county…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. BagnelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Swafford v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Swamp-Land Reclamation Dist. No. 407 v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Swamp Land District No. 307 v. GwynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- Le Strange v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. KayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Godshalk v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- McFayden v. Town of CalistogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- City of Missoula v. BakkeMontana Supreme Court · 1948