Legal Opinion

Mushed v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 26, 1922No. 23,024PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff, a resident and taxpayer in Benton county to enjoin a proposed issue of $250,000 of bonds of the county for the permanent improvement of the portion of State Roads numbered One and Four being within said county. The court after a trial on the merits denied the injunction. From the judgment entered plaintiff appeals. The facts are as follows:

In 1919 the legislature passed an act, chapter 265, p. 276, Laws 1919, which authorized the issuance of county bonds for permanently improving state roads within the county. The act contained a provision that no issue…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duncan v. CobbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Parkinson v. BrandenburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Steenerson v. FontaineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Syndicate Printing Co. v. CashmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Whiteman v. SeveranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Morris v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In Re Settlement of VenteicherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Wilson & Co. v. Otoe CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Chandler v. KroissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API