Legal Opinion

People v. Andrews

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1965No. Crim. 3591PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, J. pro tem.*

In appealing from the judgment defendant raises three assignments of error: (1) that the corpus delicti of the offenses charged was not proven to a moral certainty and beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) that the constitutional rights of defendant were infringed by the submission of the case on the transcript of testimony taken at the preliminary examination; and (3) that his constitutional rights were violated when law enforcement officers were permitted to take oral statements from him in the absence of counsel. We have examined each of these specifications and have concluded…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. AtkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. LukerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. StockmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API