Legal Opinion

Pope v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 1934No. A-8661PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Latimer county of the crime of murder in the killing of one Ellis Atohko, and his punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for the period of his natural life.

It is not deemed necessary to set out the evidence, because the contention of defendant’s counsel goes to the credibility of the state’s witnesses rather than the weight and sufficiency of the evidence.

It is first contended the trial court erred in refusing to give defendant’s requested instructions on the right of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newcomb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Ryal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Quitman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Caple v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Wilkie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. United States v. White LanceDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API