Legal Opinion

State v. Rivers

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided November 3, 2006No. A-8918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Chief Judge.

James P. Rivers faces charges of theft of unemployment benefits and making false statements to obtain unemployment benefits. Rivers moved to suppress the statements he made to a Division of Employment Security investigator at an interview. Superior Court Judge Michael L. Wolverton granted Riv~ ers's suppression motion. Judge Wolverton found that Rivers was legally compelled by state statute and Division of Employment Security policy to submit to an interview by an Employment Security Division investigator. Judge Wolverton therefore suppressed all the statements…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. People v. SkeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rivera-Padilla v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  2. State v. RiversCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API