Legal Opinion

Nemet v. Friedland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1935No. Docket No. 110, Calendar No. 38,636PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, C. J.

Plaintiff’s decedent was electrocuted September 15, 1934, and plaintiff, as administratrix of Ms estate, sued defendant to recover for tbe death of her decedent, claiming it was caused by the negligence of defendant. Suit was brought under the death act, plaintiff’s declaration alleging deceased was instantly Idlled by' electrocution, the particular negligence complained of being that the electrical wiring and equipment used by defendant had, through defendant’s negligence, become out of repair and in a dangerous condition, and had so remained for a long time. Plaintiff also counted in her…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cluett v. RosenthalMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Solomon v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. BahodaMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Elliott v. A. J. Smith Contracting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. George v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Nicholes v. LorenzMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Ilins v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API