United States v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
TEHAN, Chief Judge.
A motion wherein the moving defendants demand that the court enter a judgment against them containing all the provisions necessary to prevent and restrain the violations of the Sherman Act (15 U. S.C.A. § 1 et seq.) complained of and whereto the plaintiff, United States of America, enters vigorous opposition presents a unique, if not unprecedented, situation. This seeming abandonment of the traditional and natural positions of contending parties can best be understood by a review of the events arising not only in this case but in a companion criminal antitrust action,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Twin Ports Oil Co. v. Pure Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1939
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Ward Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- City of Burbank v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Atlantic City Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. BurchCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.