Legal Opinion

United States v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 27, 1962No. 59-C-163PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEHAN, Chief Judge.

A motion wherein the moving defendants demand that the court enter a judgment against them containing all the provisions necessary to prevent and restrain the violations of the Sherman Act (15 U. S.C.A. § 1 et seq.) complained of and whereto the plaintiff, United States of America, enters vigorous opposition presents a unique, if not unprecedented, situation. This seeming abandonment of the traditional and natural positions of contending parties can best be understood by a review of the events arising not only in this case but in a companion criminal antitrust action,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Twin Ports Oil Co. v. Pure Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Ward Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. City of Burbank v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Atlantic City Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  4. Cities Service Oil Co. v. BurchCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API