Legal Opinion

St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. Freeman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 17, 1921No. 10192PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma, County; Edward Dewes Oldfield, Judge. Action by W. S. Freeman against the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, to recover damages for loss of baggage. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county by W; S. Freeman, as plaintiff in the court below, defendant in error here, to recover $429.08 as damages sustained by reason of the loss of a trunk, against the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company. A jury was waived and the case tried to the court. Special findings of fact were made, and the court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for $225. Defendant appeals and appears here as plaintiff in error.

The facts are as follows;

W. S. Freeman was a traveling salesman selling a line of raincoats…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. FugattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. All American Bus Lines, Inc. v. SchusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Barnes v. McKinneyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. S. Toepfer, Inc. v. Braniff Airways, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Wilkes v. Braniff Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Fisk v. BullardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API