Legal Opinion
Allen v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided February 17, 2009No. 665, 2007PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice, for the majority.
The defendant-appellant, James Allen, appeals his Superior Court conviction on various charges arising from three separate incidents. Allen raises five arguments on appeal. First, Allen contends that the Superior Court erred by refusing his request to instruct the jury pursuant to Title 11, section 274 of the Delaware Code. *207Second, he argues that the Superior Court committed reversible error by limiting his attorney’s cross-examination of co-defendant Issiah Howard on prior crimes. Third, Allen claims that the Superior Court erred when it refused to grant…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David BENSIMON, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Probst v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Banther v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Guy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Erskine v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.