Legal Opinion
Guy v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided August 3, 2010No. 500, 2008PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Justice:
Tyrone Guy (“Guy”), the defendant below, appeals from the Superior Court’s denial of his Rule 61 motion for post-conviction relief. Guy was convicted of First Degree Murder, First Degree Felony Murder, Possession of a Firearm During the Commission of a Felony, Attempted First Degree Robbery, and Conspiracy. On appeal, Guy raises three claims of error. First, Guy contends that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing, because the trial judge failed to conduct a complete Batson1 analysis of the State’s peremptory challenges of several African-American members of the juror…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Outten v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- James William Riley v. Stanley W. Taylor M. Jane BradyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Guy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- State v. PhlipotSuperior Court of Delaware · 2012
- Guy v. PhelpsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Chao v. CapleDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.