Legal Opinion

Kaufmann & Baer v. Monroe Motor Line Transportation, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1936No. Appeal, 56PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J,,

Kaufmann and Baer, a Pennsylvania corporation, instituted an action for the collection of a debt from Monroe Motor Line Transportation, incorporated under the laws of New York, by issuing a writ of foreign attachment. The sheriff of Westmoreland County returned nihil habet as to the defendant; that he had seized one “Diamond T.” truck and one “Stewart” truck, in the hands of the above named garnishees, as personal property belonging to the defendant; and that Stewart Motor Trucks, Inc. had claimed both trucks. Adopting the procedure of the Sheriff’s Interpleader Act…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Braham & Co. v. Steinard-Hannon Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Klaus v. Majestic Apartment House Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Commonwealth v. One Studebaker Light Six CoupeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Barnes v. BambergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. Bank v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Sandy Sommerville, Trading and Doing Business Under the Name and Style, New Wilmington Livestock AuctionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  2. First Nat. Bk. of Jamestown v. SheldonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Taplinger v. Northwestern Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  4. Metro Plan, Inc. v. Kotcher-Turner, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Ambler National Bank v. Maryland Credit Finance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API