Kaufmann & Baer v. Monroe Motor Line Transportation, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J,,
Kaufmann and Baer, a Pennsylvania corporation, instituted an action for the collection of a debt from Monroe Motor Line Transportation, incorporated under the laws of New York, by issuing a writ of foreign attachment. The sheriff of Westmoreland County returned nihil habet as to the defendant; that he had seized one “Diamond T.” truck and one “Stewart” truck, in the hands of the above named garnishees, as personal property belonging to the defendant; and that Stewart Motor Trucks, Inc. had claimed both trucks. Adopting the procedure of the Sheriff’s Interpleader Act…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Braham & Co. v. Steinard-Hannon Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Klaus v. Majestic Apartment House Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Commonwealth v. One Studebaker Light Six CoupeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Barnes v. BambergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Bank v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Sandy Sommerville, Trading and Doing Business Under the Name and Style, New Wilmington Livestock AuctionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- First Nat. Bk. of Jamestown v. SheldonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Taplinger v. Northwestern Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Metro Plan, Inc. v. Kotcher-Turner, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Ambler National Bank v. Maryland Credit Finance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.