Legal Opinion

Dunbar Et Ux. v. Godbout

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 3, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

This is an action in which the plaintiffs seek to recover for the wrongful conversion of certain cattle. The defendants filed a plea called in the record an avowry, although incorrectly, because the action is not replevin, [Gould on Pleading (4th ed., eh. IV, § 104)], which alleged in'substance that the cattle were found damage feasant in the enclosure of the defendants Godbout, in the town of Walden; that they took the animals and inquired of the selectmen of the town whether there was a pound therein,, and were informed that Fred Allen and H. L. Gilman were the poundkeepers; that they…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Higgins, Admr. v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  2. Hazen v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  3. Poulin v. GrahamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  4. Riker v. HooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
  5. St. Albans Granite Co. v. Elwell & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Henderson and SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  2. Morgan v. KroupaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. Town of Fair Haven v. StannardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  4. Vosburgh v. KimballSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  5. Morgan v. KroupaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API