Morgan v. Kroupa
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
702 A.2d 630 (1997)
Mary MORGAN
v.
Zane KROUPA.
No. 95-594.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
September 5, 1997.
Beth Robinson of Langrock Sperry & Wool, Middlebury, for plaintiff-appellee.
Christena M. Obregon, Burlington, for defendant-appellant.
Before GIBSON, DOOLEY, MORSE and JOHNSON, JJ., and ALLEN, C.J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned.
MORSE, Justice.
Defendant Zane Kroupa appeals from a judgment awarding possession of a dog named Boy (a/k/a Max) to plaintiff Mary Morgan. We affirm.
Defendant adopted a mixed-breed puppy when it was six to eight weeks old and trained it to be a hunting dog. In July 1994, when…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Richardson v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Fredeen v. StrideOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Thiele v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Riker v. HooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
- Jankoski v. Preiser Animal Hospital, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.