Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Kroupa

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 5, 1997No. 95-594Published

1Opinion of the Court

702 A.2d 630 (1997)

Mary MORGAN

v.

Zane KROUPA.

No. 95-594.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

September 5, 1997.

Beth Robinson of Langrock Sperry & Wool, Middlebury, for plaintiff-appellee.

Christena M. Obregon, Burlington, for defendant-appellant.

Before GIBSON, DOOLEY, MORSE and JOHNSON, JJ., and ALLEN, C.J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned.

MORSE, Justice.

Defendant Zane Kroupa appeals from a judgment awarding possession of a dog named Boy (a/k/a Max) to plaintiff Mary Morgan. We affirm.

Defendant adopted a mixed-breed puppy when it was six to eight weeks old and trained it to be a hunting dog. In July 1994, when…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Fredeen v. StrideOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Thiele v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  4. Riker v. HooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
  5. Jankoski v. Preiser Animal Hospital, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API