Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Bauchwitz v. Holloman

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 2009No. Civil Action 04-2892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SAVAGE, District Judge.

In this action presenting issues relating to the False Claims Act (“FCA”) 1 statute of limitations that have not been decided by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and have divided other circuit and district courts, we hold that the tolling provision in § 3731(b)(2) does not apply to a relator when the government has not intervened, and the limitations period in 31 U.S.C. § 3731(b)(1) is triggered by the earlier filing of the claim rather than the later payment. The decision with respect to the triggering point is confined to the peculiar framework of…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. United States of America, Ex Rel. Kreindler & Kreindler, Cross-Appellee v. United Technologies Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Spay v. CVS Caremark Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. United States ex rel. Boise v. Cephalon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. United States ex rel. Bergman v. Abbot LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. City of Phila. v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. United States Ex Rel. Frascella v. Oracle Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API