Legal Opinion

Medical Ass'n of State v. Shoemake

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 24, 1995No. 2940252PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, the Medical Association of the State of Alabama and four individual physicians, filed a declaratory judgment action challenging the validity of an amendment to an administrative rule promulgated by the Alabama Board of Physical Therapy. The amendment prohibits a physical therapist from being employed by, or from otherwise participating in a professional financial arrangement with, a referring physician.1

The defendants are the Board of Physical Therapy and its individual members and the Alabama Physical Therapy Association. One of the defendants, the Board of Physical Therapy,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. RankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Har Enterprises v. Town of BrookhavenNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Agrico Chem. Co. v. DEPARTMENT, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Ex Parte Shelby Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Paymaster Oil Mill Company v. MitchellMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. United States v. ShottsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Ex Parte Howell Engineering and Surveying, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API