United States v. Sarkozy
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
KOSCINSKI, District Judge.
In this action brought under the Renegotiation Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1191 et seq., to recover excessive profits for the year ending September 30, 1942, findings of fact and conclusions of law on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment were filed on May 9, 1947, finding that plaintiff is entitled to a judgment against all defendants, and that such obligation is a joint one. Amount of the judgment was to be determined upon submission of proofs to the court concerning total credits to which defendants may be entitled; the question of tax credits was not considered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Campbell (United States, Intervenor) (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- McDuffie v. Hayes Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kurtzon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
- Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. United States of America, United States of America v. Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Ernest Kingdom v. Estate of KingdomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Kurtzon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
- United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953