Legal Opinion
State v. Tiessen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 21, 1984No. C2-84-347PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Appellant Edward J. Tiessen appeals from his conviction for burglary in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subd. 2(1), and theft in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.582, subd. 1(a) (1982 and Supp.1983). Appellant claims the evidence was insufficient because his intoxication precluded the finding of the requisite intent to commit the offenses. He also personally raises several issues which are claimed to merit a new trial. We affirm.
FACTS
At about 6:15 a.m. on August 25, 1983, Mathias Neisen, a farmer in rural Mahno-men, Minnesota, was awakened by noises in his house. He got up…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Garcia v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. St. CyrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State of Minnesota v. Armando DeLaCruz, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. NaceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: E. J. C. L., ChildCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.