Legal Opinion
State v. Nace
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 4, 1984No. C7-83-1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
Appellant Scott W. Nace was convicted by a jury of burglary in violation of Minnesota Statutes Sections 609.58, subd. 2(3) and 609.05 (1982). Appellant and a co-defendant were caught by police officers in the building they were burglarizing. On appeal, appellant claims it was error for the court to allow the jury to find out the co-defendant had earlier been convicted for the burglary. Appellant also raises numerous issues pertaining to his claim of lack of a fair trial. He also contends the evidence was insufficient and that his sentence was improper. We affirm.
FACTS
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Lewis C. Wallace v. A.L. Lockhart, Director of Arkansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- State v. LinderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986