Legal Opinion

House v. House

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 1974No. 749SC381PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CARSON, Judge.

The defendant contends that G.S. 1-105, which provides for service of process on non-resident drivers of motor vehicles, is exclusive; and an attempt to serve him by mail violates the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States by depriving him of his property without due process and denies him equal protection of law. The validity of service pursuant to *687G.S. 1-105, which designates the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles as process agent for non-resident drivers, has been repeatedly-upheld and is not challenged here. Ewing v. Thompson, 233 N.C. 564, 65 S.E. 2d 17…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. BW Acceptance Corporation v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Ewing v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Davis v. MartiniSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Denton v. EllisDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hocke v. HanyaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API