Legal Opinion

Hocke v. Hanyane

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1995No. 9318SC726PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Defendant appeals entry of judgment by default. He contends the trial court erred by: (1) rendering judgment following inadequate service of process, (2) basing the judgment upon rumor and speculation, and (3) proceeding to judgment prior to the filing of executed summons. Defendant’s assertions are unfounded.

Facts and procedural information pertinent to this appeal are as follows: In February 1988, Benedict Hanyane (defendant) was seriously injured in an automobile accident and thereafter remained totally disabled for a lengthy period of time. Carl Hocke (plaintiff) loaned…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Warzynski v. Empire Comfort Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Copley Triangle Associates v. Apparel America, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Humphrey v. SinnottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Matter of Estate of CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. House v. HouseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sellers v. MortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. Jimenez v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API