Legal Opinion
James v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 5, 2009No. 01-2011LPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WOLSKI, Judge.
The defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiff Joyce James’s takings claim against the United States. Ms. James was listed as a plaintiff in Whitley v. United States, 04-1331L, which was filed August 16, 2004 and consolidated on February 14, 2005 with Testwuide v. United States, 01-201L. For the reasons that follow, the motion is DENIED without prejudice.
I. BACKGROUND
The Whitley suit presents claims of inverse condemnation against the United States, stemming from the relocation of nine F/A-18 fleet squadrons to Naval Air Station Oceana, and the related…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Affiliated Construction Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Pellegrini v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Silver Buckle Mines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- ANGELLY v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024