Legal Opinion

Silver Buckle Mines, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 7, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00476PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RCFC 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss; Bureau of Land Management; 30 U.S.C. § 28f; unpatented mining claim maintenance fee; statutory interpretation; plain meaning; not ambiguous; no absurd result; IOAA, 31 U.S.C. § 9701(b); voluntary payment as affirmative defense

MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION

WOLSKI, Judge.

The matter before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss this case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). For the reasons discussed below, defendant’s motion is DENIED.

I.…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Silver Buckle Mines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Albano v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  3. American Ground Transportation, Inc.United States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
  4. Associated Mortgage Bankers Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  5. Hawkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API