John D. Latimer & Associates, Inc. v. Housing Authority of the City of Durham
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
By its properly preserved exceptions and assignments of error, defendant raised questions as to the sufficiency of the evidence to withstand defendant’s motions, made pursuant to Rule 50 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. 1 Defendant’s argument raises three aspects of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the submission of the issue as to an implied contract between plaintiff and defendant, so as to entitle plaintiff to recover under principles of quantum meruit. First, defendant argues that plaintiff and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Snyder v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- American Home Products Corp. v. Howell's Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- RANLO SUPPLY COMPANY v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Campbell v. BlountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hall v. MabeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Geoscience Grp., Inc. v. Waters Constr. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Triad Packaging, Inc. v. SupplyOne, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2013
- Locklear v. Wecc, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2010
- Watkins v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.