Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A. v. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Michael Schultz, Ilya Knyazev, Thomas Bennerotte, Jed Benjamin Iverson, Gabriel Johnson, Michael Fay, Brad Ratgen, Landon Barakow, Lebertha Porter
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1DissentHooten, Judge
I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. I agree with the majority'that the district court improperly granted summary judgment to SUMA, but unlike the majority, I would vacate the district court’s judgment on jurisdictional grounds. Because the Minnesota No-Fault Act provides the exclusive remedy and procedure for the payment of medical expenses arising out of an ■ automobile accident, and the no-fault act clearly provides that the medical expenses here were subject to mandatory arbitration, I would hold that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Globecon Group, LLC v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Docket No. 04-4399-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.