Legal Opinion
Christiana Mortgage Corp. v. Delaware Mortgage Bankers Ass'n
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 24, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 89-310-JRRPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this action are six mortgage brokers: Christiana Mortgage Corporation, Consolidated Mortgage Corporation, Sunvest Mortgage Corporation, Landmark Mortgage, Inc., Amato & Stella Mortgage Corporation, and Mortgage Associates, Inc. They filed suit against the Delaware Mortgage Bankers Association (“DMBA”), David C. Sorber (“Sorber”), and the Delaware Trust Company (“Delaware Trust”), claiming that an article,- written by defendant Sorber for the DMBA was libelous and intended to cause a boycott of mortgage brokers by DMBA members. In the article,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Arch v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Elliott v. ITT Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Lazy Oil, Co. v. Witco Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Gibbs v. EI DuPont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1995
- Paper Systems Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.